Prosecution and Counseling
Key IP regularly counsels clients on strategic patent portfolio management and represents them in securing and perfecting their patent rights. Our attorneys are licensed to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and have decades of experience representing clients in filing and securing the issuance of patents by the USPTO. We also assist clients in overseeing the filing and issuance of their patents in foreign countries, including Canada, Brazil, China, Japan, Korea, the United Kingdom, and the European Union and its member states. In the U.S. alone, Key IP is the attorney of record for over 150 patents and applications since 2012.
Litigation
Key IP has decades of experience representing clients all phases of patent disputes, whether as litigation counsel in federal district court or before the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation, appellate counsel in federal appellate courts, or prosecution of inter partes disputes before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Our patent dispute work has included a broad range of industries and technologies. See below for a representative list of the matters we have handled.
Exemplary Matters
Patents
Advanced Dynamic Interfaces v. Aptify Corp. (E.D. Va.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement action)
Aperture IP v. FrontPoint Security Solutions (E.D. Va.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement action)
Applied Voice & Speech Technologies v. Klausner Technologies (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) (represented petitioner regarding Inter Partes Review)
Automated Tracking Solutions v. Bon Secours (E.D. Va.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement action)
Automated Tracking Solutions v. Ekahau (E.D. Va.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement action)
Automated Tracking Solutions v. ValidFill (E.D. Va.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Barnett v. Surefire Medical (D. Colorado) (represented plaintiff in inventorship matter)
Corrino Holdings v. Expedia (W.D. Tex.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
CyWee v. Google (Fed. Cir.) (represent appellant in appeals from Inter Partes Reviews)
CyWee v. ZTE (Fed. Cir.) (represent appellant in appeal from Inter Partes Review)
Evans v. PlusOne Sports (E.D. Va.) (represented defendant/counterclaim plaintiff in trademark and patent infringement matter)
FG SRC v. Intel (Fed. Cir.) (represent appellant in appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board)
FG SRC v. Microsoft (Fed. Cir.) (represented appellant in multiple appeals from Inter Partes Reviews)
Gesture Technology v. Vidal (E.D. Va.) (represent appellant in constitutional challenge regarding Inter Partes Review and Inter Partes Reexam procedures)
Google v. CyWee (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) (represented patent owner in multiple Inter Partes Reviews)
Heavy Duty Lighting v. Accuity Brands (N.D. Ga.) (represent plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Heavy Duty Lighting v. Kichler (N.D. Oh.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Heavy Duty Lighting v. RAB Lighting (N.D. Tex.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Heavy Duty Lighting v. Xicato(W.D. Tex.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Intel v. FG SRC (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) (represented patent owner in Inter Partes Review)
Intel v. UNM Rainforest Innovations (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) (represented patent owner in multiple Inter Partes Reviews)
InvestPic v. International Business Machines, SAS (Fed. Cir.) (represented appellant in appeal from Inter Partes Reexam)
Klausner Technologies v. Applied Voice & Speech Technologies (E.D. Tex.) (represented defendant in patent infringement action)
Man-Q Corp. v. Conair (E.D. Va.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
MyClerk v. Impinj(W.D. Wa.) (represent plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Qualcomm v. UNM Rainforest Innovations (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) (represent patent owner in multiple Inter Partes Reviews
Quest Diagnostics v. UNM Rainforest Innovations (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) (represented patent owner in Inter Partes Review)
Rosebud LMS v. Salesforce (D. Del.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Salesforce v. Virtual Agility(Patent Trial and Appeal Board) (represented patent owner in one first Covered Business Method matters)
Samsung v. UUSI (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) (represented patent owner in multiple Inter Partes Reviews)
SAP v. InvestPic(Fed. Cir.) (represented appellant in appeal from district court patent infringement matter)
Shapiro v. The L.S. Starett Company (E.D. Va.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Smart Wearable Technologies v. Asus Computer (W.D. Va.) (represented defendant in patent infringement action)
SunStone Information Systems v. F5 Networks (E.D. Va.; N.D. Cal.) (represent plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Unified Patents v. Vilox Technologies (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) (represented patent owner in Inter Partes Review)
Ven Kee Communications v. Belkin (C.D. Cal.) (represented patent owner in patent infringement matter)
VenKee Communications v. Cambium Networks (W.D. Tex.) (represented patent owner in patent infringement matter)
VenKee Communications v. Fortinet (E.D. Tex.) (represented patent owner in patent infringement matter)
VenKee Communications v. TP-Link (E.D. Tex; C.D. Cal.) (represented patent owner in patent infringement matter)
VenKee Communications v. Ubiquiti (C.D. Cal.) (represent patent owner in patent infringement matter)
Vilox Technologies v. Footlocker (E.D. Tex.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement action)
Vilox Technologies v. Mindgeek(E.D. Tex.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement action)
Vilox Technologies v. Priceline Group (E.D. Tex.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement action)
Vilox Technologies v. Tripadvisor(E.D. Tex.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement action)
Vilox Technologies v. Unified Patents (Fed. Cir.) (represent appellant in appeal from Inter Partes Review)
VideoShare v. Google (D. D.C.) (represented plaintiff regarding third party subpoena in patent infringement matter)
VirtualAgility v. Salesforce (E.D. Tex.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Wireless Communications Mobile v. ADT (E.D. Tex.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Wireless Communications Mobile v. CenturyLink (E.D. Tex.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Wireless Communications Mobile v. Frontpoint Security Systems (E.D. Va.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Wireless Communications Mobile v. Monitronics(W.D. Tex.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
Wireless Communications Mobile v. Vivent(E.D. Tex.) (represented plaintiff in patent infringement matter)
ZTE v. CyWee (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) (represent patent owner in Inter Partes Review)
